|
MBNMS
Home
Introduction
Sancutary Program
Accomplishments
Intertidal
Systems
Rocky Subtidal
Systems
Open Ocean & Deep
Water Systems
The Physical
Environment
Wetlands and
Watersheds
Endangered &
Threatened Species
Marine
Mammals
Bird Populations
Marine Mammals
& Bird Surveys
Harvested Species
Human
Interactions
Further
Reading
Credits

|

|
|

|
Fish
and Invertebrate
Resources
|

|
The
ocean environment in the Monterey Bay region is
very dynamic and greatly influences resident fish
populations. This variability makes estimating the
"health" of marine fish and invertebrate
populations difficult using one year as a basis for
discussion. Additionally, most of the information
used to estimate the size of fish populations is
derived from commercial and recreational fisheries.
Catch rates are used as an index of abundance, and
long term data sets are usually needed to model or
estimate trends in the abundance of fish stocks
effectively. Even with these long term data sets,
it is often difficult to determine if changes in
fish populations are the result of societal
activities, such as fishing or coastal development,
or due to environmental changes.
Events occurring in 1998,
however, can be placed in a longer term framework
to provide an indication of the current status of
marine fish and invertebrate resources. This report
provides a brief summary of the status of fish
stocks in the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary from 1980-95 as described in Fishery
Resources of the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary, and discusses the main events affecting
fishery resources in 1998.
About 200 species are
typically caught in commercial and recreational
fisheries in the Sanctuary. From 1980-95, reported
commercial catches increased or were stable for
about 17 percent of the species frequently
harvested in this region. Reported catches declined
for about 10 percent of the frequently harvested
species. Catches and thus population status of
other species are either unknown or highly
variable. Invertebrate species most frequently
harvested commercially include spot prawn, pink
shrimp, Dungeness crab, rock crab, and market
squid. Harvests of spot prawn, Dungeness crab, and
rock crab all increased from 1980-95. Pink shrimp
populations declined throughout much of the late
1980s, then increased from 1994-95. The market
squid population was low during the El Niño
years of 1983-84, reached record levels in 1994-97,
then declined dramatically with the onset of the
1997-98 El Niño.
Shark and ray species are
no longer harvested in large numbers in the
Sanctuary. There is, however, evidence to suggest
that the population sizes of some shark and ray
species are lower now than they were before 1980.
Chinook, or "king," salmon is the most common
anadromous species caught in the Sanctuary.
Reported catches of Chinook salmon have been high
in the last few years. Scientific stock assessments
indicate that the fall run Chinook salmon of the
Sacramento River is in good shape, but that
populations of Coho salmon and winter and spring
run Chinook salmon are severely depressed.
Steelhead populations are extremely depressed in
this area, due primarily to degraded stream
habitats.
Abundances of most pelagic
species are greatly determined by large scale
environmental phenomena. Northern anchovy and
Pacific sardine are the predominant nearshore
pelagic fishes caught in the Sanctuary. Anchovy
spawning biomass in Central California declined
after 1985, but experienced a substantial increase
from 1994-95. Pacific sardine populations are also
increasing rapidly throughout their range after
nearly disappearing from the region in the 1950s.
In 1998 the commercial fishers reported seeing
large numbers of small (young) sardines. The
population of Pacific albacore, another common
pelagic species, is currently thought to be stable
or increasing.
Biological and fishery
data indicate that lingcod may be overfished in
much of their range. In 1998 the Pacific Fishery
Manage-ment Council's stock assessments indicate
that lingcod abundance is at approximately 9
percent of the estimated unfished biomass off
Washington and Oregon. This caused the Council to
reduce recreational harvest quotas and begin to
develop a rebuilding plan. Similarly, sablefish
have been heavily fished in California waters.
Sablefish catches in the Sanctuary have been
decreasing since 1980, but data from recent surveys
suggest the population may be increasing. Pacific
hake are very abundant seasonally in the Sanctuary
as they migrate from Mexican to Canadian waters.
Pacific hake catches were high off Central
California throughout most of the 1980s.
"Of
course, El Niño was the big story in 1998.
For example, it affected the migration patterns of
salmon and squid, which looked for colder water so
were less plentiful here. Conversely, albacore came
in more because of the warm waters."
Dave Danbom, Moss
Landing
Fishing Industry Representative,
Sanctuary Advisory Council
Rockfishes are the most
diverse group of fishes living in Sanctuary waters.
Sufficient data are available to show stable or
increasing trends in abundance for some rockfishes
such as bank, chilipepper, shortbelly, widow, and
splitnose. Other rockfish species such as bocaccio,
yellowtail, canary, and Pacific ocean perch have
exhibited decreasing trends in abundance along the
U.S. West Coast. Many of these depleted rockfishes
are deep water species that are slow growing, long
lived, or have experienced high exploitation rates.
Fishery managers are concerned about the capability
of some of these species to recover from high
harvest rates and in 1998 continued to reduce
harvest guidelines for many rockfish
species.
"This
was a good year for albacore, which attracts a lot
of fishermen. However, fishing for rockfish, the
'bread and butter species,' was dismal. Our Cambria
sports fishing club catch was down this year,
except for blue bass."
Dr. Mal Stock,
Fisher, Cambria
Several species of fishes
that occur in kelp forests and other nearshore
habitats are under high fishing pressure from both
commercial and sport anglers. In the late 1980s,
fishers started transporting fish alive to
restaurants. This type of fishery became very
lucrative and fishing pressure increased rapidly.
Landings of live fish in Central California
increased from 15,000 pounds in 1989 to 536,000
pounds in 1997. The result of this interest in live
fish for the restaurant market was an increase in
the harvest of immature fish, a major resource
conservation problem. There are already signs that
some nearshore species such as cabezon are rapidly
becoming depleted from the high fishing pressure.
New legislation was enacted in 1998 that placed
size limits on many nearshore fishes and directed
the California Department of Fish and Game to
develop specific fishery management plans for
nearshore species. California AB 1241 also provided
a fundamental change in the way that fisheries
management will take place in California in the
future. It requires the state to manage fisheries
proactively for sustainability, instead of for
short-term profits. It also transfers much of the
responsibility for management from the legislature
to the Fish and Game Commission.
"This
year was a disaster for squid fishermen -
literally. The disaster people came and made loans,
but the fishermen are still feeling the effects. A
few were able to switch and fish sardines, but even
that hasn't been very good - the sardines have been
very small. Only about fifteen tons of squid were
caught on the whole Central Coast this year,
whereas the typical catch is around 7-8,000 tons,
and as high as 15,000 tons, for a
season."
Dave Crabbe
Fisher, Monterey
Surfperches represent a
diverse group of nearshore fishes in the Sanctuary
waters. Historical catch data show that surfperch
populations have declined, due to a number of
factors including environmental variation, lower
production caused by smaller fish, habitat
degradation, and increased fishing pressure. In
contrast, landing data and stock assessments
suggest that populations of most species of
flatfishes are robust and could withstand increased
levels of harvest.
In addition to population
changes brought about by fishing activities, broad
scale environmental changes affected marine
resources in 1998. Most notably, marine habitats
and species were affected by strong El Niño
conditions. The marine environment experienced high
inflows of fresh water, sediments, and nutrients
from winter floods. Northwest winds were lighter
than normal, causing poor upwelling conditions.
These poor upwelling conditions have been shown to
be detrimental to survival of juveniles of many
local species, such as rockfishes. Water
temperatures were also 2 - 4° C above normal,
probably causing poor survival of many species, but
notably juvenile market squid. The strong water
mass flow from the south and corresponding warm
water brought many species to this area that are
not typically seen here. Species that occurred in
the Sanctuary in 1998 that are typically not seen
in large numbers included albacore, sheephead,
marlin, swordfish, pelagic red crabs, and jumbo
squid.
"This
summer on the ocean we saw a northern shift in the
salmon population, with smaller fish being caught
here and the larger fish in Oregon. This happened
in the 1992 El Niño as well. Some remnants
of this El Niño were still evident at the
end of summer, with barracuda and giant squid being
caught, both of which are usually found farther
south."
Duncan McLean,
Fisher, El Granada
The Sanctuary's enabling
legislation excludes fishery management from the
purview of its regulations. The Sanctuary charge is
to protect resources, however, and there is much
the Sanctuary program can do to improve fishery
management. More scientific information is needed
to optimize catches from fisheries without
depleting fish populations. Information is needed
not only on population abundance and critical life
history stages, but on the interactions between
species, the effect of harvest activities on marine
habitats, and the effect of environmental change on
marine fishes. Increased research is also needed to
evaluate the design and effectiveness of current
methodologies, as well as to develop new, more
efficient management strategies.
Richard M. Starr
University of California Sea Grant Extension
Program
|
Kelp
Harvesting
Many activities,
consumptive and non-consumptive, could
have an effect on a kelp forest and its
ecology. In the interest of resource
protection, the Sanctuary collaborates
with researchers, kelp harvesters, and
other interests to determine if the
effects of kelp harvesting are
ecologically important.
South of Monterey
Bay, kelp is harvested primarily by large
vessels and is used as a processed food
additive. Kelco, a subsidiary of Monsanto,
is the major kelp harvester south of
Monterey Bay. While Kelco's operations are
mostly in southern California, it
occasionally cuts kelp in the Sanctuary in
late summer and early fall. In fall 1998,
for one day, a Kelco boat cut kelp as far
north as Carmel Bay.
Kelp on and north
of the Monterey Peninsula is primarily
hand-harvested, and fed to abalone in
mariculture farms and used as substrate
for herring roe spawnings (exported for
sushi). From Cypress Point to the Monterey
Coast Guard Wharf, kelp harvesters removed
571 and 683 tons in 1996 and 1997,
respectively, according to the California
Department of Fish and Game (DFG). The
long-term average of kelp harvested around
the peninsula is higher than this, due to
occasional visits from Kelco's ship. While
many biologists believe this level is not
environmentally detrimental to the kelp
plants, increased harvesting has led to
"use-conflicts" with non-consumptive users
(divers, kayakers, hoteliers,
conservationists).
Since 1996 the
Sanctuary has been working with DFG, local
kelp harvesters, and non-consumptive use
interests to develop a non-regulatory
solution to kelp "use-conflicts" along the
Monterey and Pacific Grove coasts. These
efforts have partially paid off: in
September 1998 all the kelp harvesters who
use that area signed an agreement to work
among themselves and with other
non-consumptive users for the benefit of
all interests, and to ensure sustainable
kelp harvesting in that area.
Additionally, in 1998 the cities of
Monterey and Pacific Grove issued
resolutions designating this area as being
of special environmental
significance.
The Sanctuary
retains authority under its Management
Plan to regulate kelp harvesting, and is
interested in furthering the scientific
understanding of kelp harvesting impacts.
To this end, in 1998 we funded some
research on the effects of kelp harvesting
on kelp canopy cover, and will expand that
work in the next year.
Aaron King
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary
|
|