|

|
Examples
of Endangered and Threatened Species in the Sanctuary
Before an animal species can receive
protection under the Endangered Species Act, it must first be
placed on the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife.
An "endangered" species is one that is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
A "threatened" species is one that is likely to become
endangered in the foreseeable future. More than 55 percent of
all the species federally listed as threatened or endangered reside
in California. Twenty-six of these reside within the Sanctuary.
One Sanctuary resident, the American Peregrine Falcon, brings
a hopeful sign for the future. It was removed as a threatened
species in August 1999 due to the species' recovery but will be
monitored closely for the next five years. The tidewater goby
is currently under consideration for delisting in the future.
|
Organism
|
Habitat
and Time of Year of Most Common Sightings
|
Federal
Status
(Date Listed)
|
Population
at Height
|
Current
Population
|
Current
Trend in Population (+/-)
|
Major
Initial Causes of
Mortality
|
|
|
Cetaceans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sei
whale
(Balaenoptera borealis)
|
Deep
water during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
256000
(world)
|
57000
(world)
|
-
|
Commercial
whaling
|
|
|
Blue
whale
(Balaenoptera musculus)
|
Deep
water during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
228000
(world)
|
1716
(California)
|
+
|
Commercial
whaling
|
|
|
Finback
whale
(Balaenoptera physalus)
|
Deep
water
during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
300,000-65000
(world)
|
40,000
(Northern Hemisphere)
|
-
|
Commercial
whaling
|
|
|
Humpback
whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae)
|
Water
>300m
during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
>100,000
(world)
|
10000
(world)
|
+
|
Net
entanglement; collisions with ships; noise disturbances;
pollution; and competition with
|
|
|
Right
whale
Balaena glacialis)
|
Water
>300m during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
100000
(world)
|
200
(Pacific Ocean)
|
+
|
Commercial
whaling; ship collisions; and net entanglement
|
|
|
Sperm
whale
(Physeter macrocephalus)
|
Water
>600m
during upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
>2
million
(world)
|
N/A
|
+
|
Commercial
whaling
|
|
|
Pinnipeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guadalupe
fur seal
(Arctocephalus townsendi)
|
Sanctuary
sightings are rare
|
Threatened
(16-Dec-67)
|
20,000
- 100,000
(Pacific Ocean)
|
7400
(Pacific Ocean)
|
-
|
Commercial
hunting; coastal development; and competition with fisheries
for prey
|
|
|
Steller
sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus)
|
Año
Nuevo/
mid-August
|
Threatened
(5-Apr-90)
|
282000
(Pacific Ocean)
|
500
(California)
|
-
|
Reduced
prey availability; disease
|
|
|
Fissiped
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern
sea otter
(Enhydra lutris nereis)
|
Inshore
and kelp forests/year round
|
Threatened
(14-Jan-77)
|
20000
(Pacific Ocean)
|
2300
(California)
|
+
|
Commercial
hunting
|
|
|
Land
Mammals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt
marsh harvest mouse
(Reithrodontomys raviventris)
|
Coastal
salt marshes/
|
Endangered
|
N/A
|
<
2,000
|
N/A
|
Loss
of habitat due to land plants, and flooding
|
|
|
Birds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Peregrine Falcon
(Falco peregrinus anatum)
|
Beaches,
dunes, and Elkhorn Slough/ year round
|
Delisted
(5-Aug-99)
|
1,000
pairs
(western U.S.)
|
167
pairs
(western U.S.)
|
+
|
Pesticides
causing thin egg shells
|
|
|
California
Condor
(Gymnogyps californianus)
|
Near
Big Sur/year round
|
Endangered
(11-Mar-67)
|
N/A
|
50
(in wild)
|
+ slowly
|
Human-related
habitat loss and reduced food supply
|
|
|
California
Brown Pelican
(Pelicanus occidentalis californicus)
|
Along
coast/largest concentration in mid-summer
|
Endangered
(13-Oct-70)
|
N/A
|
4500
breeding pairs
|
stable
|
DDT
causing thin egg shells
|
|
|
California
Clapper Rail
(Rallus longirostris obsoletus)
|
Tidal
slough/year round
|
Endangered
(13-Oct-70)
|
N/A
|
<
1,000
(California)
|
N/A
|
Loss
of habitat due to urban runoff; contamination of food supplies
|
|
|
Western
Snowy Plover
(Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus)
|
Dry
stretches of beaches/
Mar.- Sept.
|
Threatened
(05-Apr-93)
|
N/A
|
1386
(world)
|
-
|
Loss
of nesting habitat
|
|
|
Marbled
Murrelet
(Brachyramphus marmoratus)
|
Coastal
waters/year round
|
Threatened
(30-Sept-92)
|
60000
(California)
|
2,000
- 5,000
(California)
|
-
|
Habitat
disturbances including logging in nesting areas and oil
spills; and fishing net fatalities
|
|
|
Turtles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green
sea turtle
(Chelonia mydas)
|
Early
fall after upwelling
|
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
N/A
|
200-1,100
nesting females on US beaches
|
N/A
|
Commercial
harvesting; caught as incidental catch during commercial
shrimp trawling
|
|
|
Leatherback
sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea)
|
Early
fall after upwelling
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
N/A
|
29,000-40,000
(world)
|
-
|
Disturbance
of nesting grounds; egg harvesting; hunted for oil;
|
|
Pacific
Ridley sea turtle
(Lepidochelys olivacea)
|
Early
fall after upwelling |
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Commercial
harvesting |
|
Loggerhead
sea turtle
(Caretta caretta)
|
Early
fall after upwelling |
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Caught
during shrimp trawling; coastal development |
|
| Fishes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chinook
salmon - winter
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) |
mid-water ocean; rivers to spawn |
Endangered
(03-Feb-94)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Habitat
degradation; dams; drought |
|
Chinook
salmon - fall/late fall
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) |
mid-water
ocean; rivers to spawn |
Candidate
(16-Sep-99)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Habitat
degradation; dams; drought |
|
Chinook
salmon - spring
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) |
mid-water
ocean; rivers to spawn |
Endangered
(15-Nov 99)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Habitat
degradation |
|
Coho
salmon - central California
(Oncorhynchus kisutch) |
mid-water
ocean; rivers to spawn |
Threatened
(31-Oct-96)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
|
|
Steelhead
- central California
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
|
river
basins |
Threatened
(18-Aug-97)
|
N/A |
100
-1300
(<1% of the height hydropower development; dams; of abundance)
|
- |
Habitat
degradation due to increased sedimentation |
|
Steelhead
- south/central California
(Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus)
|
river
basins |
Threatened
(17-Oct-97)
|
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Habitat degradation |
|
Tidewater
goby
(Eucyclogoblus newberry)
|
river
mouths; estuarine waters |
Endangered
(04-Feb-94) |
N/A |
N/A |
+ |
Habitat
loss; pollution |
|
|
Status
of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in Coastal Watersheds Entering
the Sanctuary
|
|
We are very close to losing coho salmon
from coastal streams of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.
The only remaining streams in the Monterey Bay region having adult
coho salmon runs in most years are Scott and Waddell creeks, located
in northern Santa Cruz County. They have been lost from the larger
San Lorenzo River and Soquel Creek watersheds, and a recovery
plan is underway. Steelhead populations are faring better than
coho around the Sanctuary. Since the drought of 1987-92, higher
annual rainfall has allowed increased juvenile populations in
most watersheds with some population stability. Most of the major
coho and steelhead watersheds entering the Sanctuary are described
briefly below.
In Scott and Waddell creeks, coho populations have been
severely reduced by natural phenomena such as drought and late
winter storms as well as water diversions, erosion induced by
logging, and a toxic chemical spill on Waddell Creek. The mouth
of Scott Creek is negatively impacted by the Highway 1 bridge,
which often delays the opening of the sandbar to allow upstream
migration and causes premature sandbar closure in the spring.
Adult coho populations are unstable at 100 to 200 in Waddell and
100 to 500 in Scott Creek. Steelhead, with their more flexible
life history for spawning and rearing, are faring better at stable
adult populations of 200 to 400 in each creek.
The San Lorenzo River watershed is impacted by the flood
control channel through Santa Cruz; the artificial breaching of
the summer sandbar at the river mouth, which destroys lagoon nursery
habitat; water diversion, which makes spawning migration difficult,
if not impossible; and accelerated logging without adequate regulation
and enforcement. The San Lorenzo River supports approximately
2,500 steelhead adults and 150,000 juveniles.
The Soquel Creek watershed is threatened by suburban sprawl
in the lower valley, with proposed winter water diversion and
increasing amounts of impermeable surfaces that increase winter
storm flows, washing away steelhead nests and reducing summer
base flow important for rearing juveniles. Increased logging without
adequate environmental protection has accelerated erosion and
sedimentation. The lower five miles of Soquel Creek have lost
substantial riparian vegetation to stream bank erosion, and few
steelhead use this reach for rearing, presumably due to high summer
water temperatures and poor spawning success. Soquel Creek supports
500 to 800 adult and 50,000 juvenile steelhead.
The large Pajaro River watershed is being devastated by
human development outside Santa Cruz County. Municipal water diversion,
reservoirs, and agricultural pumping have drastically reduced
rearing habitat throughout. Steelhead habitat exists only in the
upper headwaters of tributaries. Thus, successful adult passage
to spawning grounds and successful smolt passage to Monterey Bay
are critically important. The lower reaches of most Pajaro tributaries
go dry in summer. If they become dewatered earlier in spring,
smolt migration will become even more tenuous. During the past
drought, only hatchery augmentation maintained the Pajaro steelhead
population, which probably numbers in the low to mid hundreds
as adults.
Though the steelhead run of the Carmel River has rebounded
from near extinction since the drought to 500+ adults counted
at the San Clemente Dam in the late 1990s, the population is maintained
by an active rescue effort. This involves relocating juveniles
from the lower river to perennial habitat below San Clemente Dam
each summer/fall, as municipal well pumping dewaters the lower
valley. Adults must be trapped and trucked above Los Padres Reservoir
in winter to access 15+ miles of the best habitat. Spawning and
rearing habitat in the lower watershed has become severely degraded
from sedimentation caused by increased agricultural development
(vineyards) and is further threatened by sediment to be released
from behind San Clemente Dam.
In the Santa Rosa Creek watershed, juvenile steelhead
in the lower valley are restricted to shallow pools -- primarily
under woody debris and overhanging willows -- and in the upper
canyon, to deeper pools, hiding under banks protected by riparian
trees and under large boulders. Potentially increased water dev-elopment
that would further reduce summer base flow is a concern here.
Recent agricultural conversion from cattle grazing to vineyards
may result in increased stream sedimentation with reduced summer
base flow. The juvenile population has increased steadily since
the drought, to about 50,000, with a probable adult run of 200
to 400 fish in this important southern watershed.
Although juvenile steelhead numbers have improved, coho have
been lost from major watersheds and risk extinction within the
Sanctuary. Coho and steelhead habitat is threatened throughout
the Sanctuary from increased water development, urbanization,
flood control projects, marine mammal predation, agricultural
conversion, and destructive logging practices. The California
Forest Practices Rules must be strengthened, and long-term monitoring
and maintenance of erosion control measures should be instituted
after timber harvest to allow further coho and steelhead recovery.
No-cut buffers should be established and enforced along all watercourses
in all timber harvest zones, residential areas, and agricultural
lands to protect remaining habitat.
Donald Alley
D.W. Alley & Associates, Aquatic Biology
|
Following
the Leatherback Sea Turtle
|
|
|
|
| Female
leatherbacks come ashore at night to lay eggs on beaches.
Photo ©Scott A. Eckert |
One of the greatest mysteries of the sea
turtle world is where the pelagic leatherback (Dermochelys
coriacea) spends its time. The leatherback is the largest
turtle in the world and has the widest geographic range of any
reptile. It is found in all of the world's major oceans and has
been observed from the Arctic Circle to the edges of the Antarctic
convergence zone. Leatherbacks are also one of the deepest diving
animals known -- descending to depths in excess of 1,300 meters.
We have monitored individuals as they circumnavigate entire ocean
basins -- distances of more than 10,000 kilometers -- in a single
year. To observe or study leatherbacks is extremely difficult,
however: not only do they range across open oceans, they rarely
stop swimming and they spend more than 80 percent of their lives
underwater. For these reasons, their activities in the open sea
remain poorly understood.
Yet understanding the oceanic movements of this turtle, and applying
this knowledge to related management issues, is critical to its
survival. The leatherback is the world's most endangered sea turtle,
with populations in the Pacific Ocean declining at a disastrous
rate. Since 1980 leatherback populations in the Eastern Pacific
have dropped by more than
90 percent, and the accidental killing of leatherbacks by high-seas
commercial fishing fleets is a major contributor to that decline.
Without a clear understanding of the habitat needs and migratory
pathways of this species, we are unable to develop sound methods
to reduce this source of mortality. One study
suggests that if current trends continue the leatherback will
become extinct in the Pacific Ocean within the next ten years.
Satellite telemetry has become a vital tool in our efforts to
understand this species' use of the oceans. In our studies, we
have monitored the movements of female leatherbacks from nesting
beaches in the Atlantic and the Pacific and discovered that these
turtles make extraordinary post-nesting migrations of tens of
thousands of kilometers, sometimes along distinct oceanic corridors.
However, getting access to the turtles in order to attach transmitters
is challenging. In all past studies transmitters were attached
to females during nesting (when the turtles were on land and therefore
accessible). Further, due to technical challenges most tracking
cycles have been limited to less than a year in duration, with
our longest track covering eighteen months -- whereas in the Pacific
leatherback females only return to nest every three years. Where
do they travel in the intervening years and what habitats are
important to this global wanderer? These are questions that we
have yet to answer.
|
|
| Leatherback
sea turtle. Photo © Scott A. Eckert |
This summer, with the financial support of our home institutions
(National Marine Fisheries Service and Hubbs Sea World Research
Institute) and Chevron Oil Company and with the logistical support
of Moss Landing Marine Laboratory and the Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary, we accomplished an exciting breakthrough. For
the first time in the Pacific, transmitters were placed on leatherbacks
at sea. We captured, tagged, and released two mature females while
they were foraging on jellyfish in the Sanctuary. Genetic analysis
has revealed that both turtles originate from Western Pacific
nesting beaches, possibly in Indonesia. As this is written, both
turtles appear to be headed directly to their natal areas in Asia
on what we hope is a pre-nesting migration. Each transmitter is
sending us data that are important to understanding habitat use,
including water temperature, the depth and duration of dives,
and the length of time spent at particular depths. If we are successful
at tracking these turtles all the way home, it will represent
the first time leatherbacks have been tracked during their migrations
prior to nesting, as they move from foraging grounds in the eastern
Pacific to their nesting beaches in Asia. (To follow these leatherbacks
with us, visit our Web site at: www.hswri.org.)
Scott A. Eckert1 and Peter H. Dutton2
1Hubbs Sea World Research Institute
2Southwest Fisheries Science Center
|
 
|