|

|
Water quality in many surface waters
in the contiguous forty-eight states fails to meet the goals of
the Clean Water Act of 1972. The severity of the problem is illustrated
by the nutrient-rich water (largely derived from rainfall runoff
from farms) entering the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River.
The river has created a plume in the Gulf, called the dead
zone,' which can be 7,000 square miles in size. Fortunately, water
quality in Monterey Bay is good compared to the Gulf of Mexico,
since it is well mixed with the Pacific Ocean. Nevertheless, surface
waters in Pajaro Valley, the Elkhorn Slough Estuary (in areas
with limited mixing with the bay), and Salinas Valley have elevated
nitrate levels.
Vegetative buffer strips can successfully reduce pollutants generated
by rainfall runoff from entering surface waters. Vegetative buffers
are areas of vegetation that capture pollutants physically or
transform them to non-mobile (such as soil organic matter) or
gas (such as di-nitrogen, nitrous oxide) forms. Their success
is best documented along the Atlantic Coastal Plain, but has been
promoted in many states.
With funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
vegetative buffer strips were established in Elkhorn Slough to
test their efficacy in removing sediments and nutrients before
they entered the Slough. Three treatments -- an annual grass,
a mix of native perennial grasses, and an "unplanted"
(weedy) treatment -- of buffers were established to receive runoff
from row crops.
All buffer treatments successfully reduced sediments within the
first few meters of the buffers after above-ground biomass had
become well established. Sediment removal was due to increasing
water infiltration and slowing runoff velocities in the buffers
that allowed sediment deposition.
However, nutrient capture is more complicated because its removal
is biologically mediated. In contrast to the Atlantic Coastal
Plain, rainfall along the Monterey Bay coast is restricted to
the winter months; thus processes that remove nitrogen vary dramatically
on a seasonal basis. I found that nitrogen was captured by growing
plants and soil microbes in the winter and spring, which suggested
that grass buffers assimilate nitrogen from agricultural runoff.
In contrast to the winter and spring, plant material and soil
microbes died in the summer and fall. Because of their death,
nitrate and ammonium forms of nitrogen, which were previously
captured in the spring, were released into the soil. High concentrations
of soil nitrate in the fall can be carried to the Slough after
the first rainfall events through subsurface flow. Results from
all three treatments suggest that nitrogen retention by vegetative
buffers in California may not be as successful as grass buffers
in other parts of the country.
Nitrogen cycling in soils is one source of the trace gas nitrous
oxide -- a greenhouse gas. In the buffers established, the estimated
trace gas emissions were extremely high. Therefore, even though
nitrogen is being removed from groundwater before entering Elkhorn
Slough, some of the nitrogen is converted to a greenhouse gas.
Vegetative buffers convert a water pollutant into an atmospheric
pollutant, although the significance of this source of nitrous
oxide is currently under investigation. This study should be used
to highlight some limitations for using vegetative buffer strips
to reduce nitrogen pollution. Instead, vegetative buffer strips
should be seen as only one potential strategy and used in concert
with other strategies to control nitrogen losses from agricultural
fields.
Marc Los Huertos
University of California Santa Cruz
|
"Snapshot
Day":
Volunteers Take the Pulse of Sanctuary Watersheds
|
|
On Earth Day 2000 the Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary helped lead the charge in the largest simultaneous
water quality monitoring effort to occur in California. More than
120 trained volunteers participated in "Snapshot Day,"
a Sanctuary-wide volunteer monitoring event designed to increase
public awareness about water quality issues affecting watersheds
that drain to the Sanctuary.
Armed with test tubes, thermometers, buckets, and cameras, volunteers
fanned out into the Sanctuary's eleven major watersheds, from
Pacifica to Cambria. By early afternoon, volunteers had tested
eighty-nine rivers and creeks at 122 different sampling sites,
spanning over 300 miles of the central coast. They monitored for
air and water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity,
nutrients, and bacteria levels.
The results showed overall water quality in many of the Sanctuary's
watersheds to be very good. The volunteer data did indicate problems,
however, in several watersheds. Eighteen sampling sites displayed
high levels of fecal coliform bacteria, indicating waters unsafe
for contact. Sixteen sites were found to have high levels of nitrates
or phosphates, which can have negative impacts on aquatic life.
These contaminants were found in both urban and rural locations.
Several rivers and creeks also showed low levels of oxygen, which
all aquatic animals need to breathe.
|
|
| Figure
1: Snapshot Day 2000. Locations of all Snapshot Day stations.
Stations are depicted as a dot (). The watershed
boundaries are depicted on the figure. |
The data collected from Snap- shot Day help establish much-needed
baseline information about the health of Sanctuary watersheds
as well as flagging potential problem areas. Currently, fewer
than 5 percent of California's water bodies are tested on a regular
basis by government agencies, due to lack of funds and/or staff.
The information collected from.
Snapshot Day in 2000 and subsequent years can be used by resource
managers to help make planning decisions and protect Sanctuary
resources better. Snapshot Day was organized as part of the Monterey
Bay Sanctuary Citizen Watershed Monitoring Network, established
by the Coastal Watershed Council, the Center for Marine Conservation,
the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Coastal
Commission in partnership with the Sanctuary's Water Quality Protection
Program. The Network supports the year-round efforts of approximately
twenty existing volunteer monitoring groups throughout the Sanctuary
and its watersheds. Its goals are to ensure high quality data,
to facilitate public and agency use of that data, and to increase
public stewardship of local waterways within the Sanctuary's watersheds.
For a more detailed look at Snapshot Day results, see the Snapshot
Day Report on the Sanctuary's Web site: montereybay.nos.noaa.gov/
monitoringnetwork/welcome.html.
Susan Pufahl1, Kaitilin Gaffney2, Maya Conrad3, and Ross Clark4
1Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
2Center for Marine Conservation
3Coastal Watershed Council
4California Coastal Commission
|
Roller
Coaster Year for Caspian Terns at Elkhorn Slough
|
|
| Both
adults and chicks vocalize frequently, so the tern colony
is a raucous place. ©2000 Bruce Lyon |
For the first time in five years,
hundreds of Caspian terns, the world's largest tern, nested
at Elkhorn Slough. For several years in the early 1990s,
the colony had thrived on an island in the Slough's restored
South Marsh. Then, in 1995, disaster hit and few chicks
hatched and even fewer fledged. Research by J. Parkin suggested
that the crash was due to DDT and other contaminants entering
the watershed during heavy flooding. In the following years,
only a few terns nested on the island, and these abandoned
it after their eggs were destroyed by an unknown predator.
This year, the terns were back in large numbers, with high
hatching success. In late June there were about sixty-five
active nests, most with a single small chick. Unfortun-ately,
the colony was attacked by raccoons (identified by footprints)
at the end of July. Our subsequent survey revealed about
forty chick carcasses strewn about the abandoned island,
and only four of the largest fledglings appeared to have
survived. The threat of pesticides is diminishing, thanks
to successful efforts to control agricultural erosion in
the watershed. Now, methods must be developed to keep raccoons
from the island, so that these spectacular birds can again
breed in large numbers at Elkhorn Slough.
Bruce Lyon, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
UCSC
Kerstin Wasson, Research Coordinator, Elkhorn Slough Reserve
|
|
 
|