skip to Main Content skip to Section Navigation in text click here to go to site navigation in text
nms logo for banner graphic RP Banner
click here to go to home pageclick here to go to site search
click here to go to the about the mbnms section click here to go to the visitors information section click here to go to the research and monitoring section click here to go to the resource management issues section click here to go to the education and research section
facebook twitter

Resource Protection Issues

Acoustic Impacts

Beach Closures

Coastal Armoring

Cruise Ships

Desalination

Dredging

Ecosystem-Based Management Initiative

Ecosystem Conservation & Biodiversity Protection

Emergency Response & Oil Spills

Fishing

Invasive Species

Kelp Harvesting

Krill Harvesting

Landslide Disposal

Lost Fishing Gear

Marine Protected Areas

Maritime Heritage

Military Activities

Motorized Personal

Watercraft

Oil & Gas Development

Seabed Disturbance

Vessel Traffic

Water Quality

Wildlife Disturbance

 
 

Restoration Plan for The M/V Med Taipei ISO Container Discharge Incident

Benthic Assessment
 

Monitoring the impact of lost container TGHU7712262 to deep seafloor habitat at Smooth Ridge

15 Containers Lost, One of Them Found
TGHU7712262 is the ID number of the only container found after the M/V Med Taipei’s accidental loss at sea of 15 cargo containers, while transiting through Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) in 2004. This 40-foot long intermodal cargo container (and the 1,159 steel-belted automobile tires inside) has been resting inverted on the seafloor since 2004, at a depth of 1,281 meters (4,203 feet) on Smooth Ridge, a submarine formation extending southwest from Monterey Bay, California.

Container TGHU7712262 in MBNMS Map of Smooth Ridge
This shipping container was discovered upside down on the seafloor by MBARI researchers in June 2004, four months after it was lost at sea. A joint expedition of MBNMS and MBARI research staff revisited this site in April 2011.
Image: © 2004 MBARI
Smooth Ridge, a submarine formation extending southwest from Monterey Bay, is the current location of cargo container TGHU7712262, lost at sea in 2004. Click here for larger detail.

 

What Happens to Lost Containers?

This was not an exceptional accident. According to the shipping industry, tens of thousands of intermodal containers have already been discharged into the world’s ocean, and thousands are lost at sea every year. Container losses not only represent a tremendous waste of manufacturing effort, energy and money, but they also aggravate the impacts of marine debris as they take centuries to degrade, and in certain cases they may release hazardous and toxic materials into the environment. Furthermore, as lost containers get scattered along international shipping routes, they begin to form stepping stones of hard surfaces between harbors (along extensive areas of soft seafloor habitats) potentially disturbing local ecological interactions, influencing recruitment and migration patterns of species, and conceivably favoring the expansion of invasive species distribution. For all these reasons it is important to bring public attention to this new concept in terms of human impacts to the ocean.

Compensatory Restoration
Using funds from the legal settlement of $3.25 million between NOAA and the shipping company responsible for dropping the containers, MBNMS is conducting a deep benthic assessment and monitoring of the site where container TGHU7712262 is located. This will improve our understanding of decomposition rates and potential impacts over time of steel containers and contents, as well as the recovery rates of natural habitats in the deep seafloor. Since several hundred container ships transit through the MBNMS each year, the chances for additional container discharges, past and future, are very likely. Monitoring TGHU7712262 will allow MBNMS to assess and understand ongoing impacts, in order to take more direct restorative or mitigatory action. Ongoing assessment and monitoring will also generate valuable information on fate and effects of container deposition, to help shape future response policy and strategies to prevent deep-ocean habitat disturbance.

Lost Container Expedition

Shipping container TGHU7712262, seven years after it was lost at sea.
Shipping container TGHU7712262, seven years after it was lost at sea. In April 2011, a joint expedition of MBNMS and MBARI research staff revisited this site to assess the current condition of the lost container and the deep seafloor habitat around it.
Images: © 2004 MBARI, Chad King and Sacha Lozano (MBNMS)
MBARI's remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Doc Ricketts
MBARI's remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Doc Ricketts, control room and launch through the "moon pool" on the research vessel Western Flyer.
Images: Todd Walsh (c) 2009 MBARI; Chad King and Sacha Lozano (MBNMS)
During March 8-10 2011, a team of scientists and educators from Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) conducted a research expedition on board MBARI’s research vessel Western Flyer, to investigate the current condition and potential ecological impacts of the lost container, TGHU7712262.

Remote Control Deep-Sea Exploration
Despite the very deep location (4,203 feet) of TGHU7712262, scientists were able to explore closely both the container and the deep seafloor around it, using a robotic submersible – MBARI’s remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Doc Ricketts. The ROV allowed them to take high-resolution photographs and video footage, and collect biological and sediment samples from the deep seafloor. Scientists were particularly interested in comparing the communities of sea life and the chemistry (carbon and nitrogen) of sediments that were found on (and around) the container, versus those on the seafloor at different distances from it.

Potential impacts from this and other lost containers to deep-sea habitats and biological communities include:

  • Crushing and smothering of organisms living on the bottom.
  • Shifts in local ecology.
  • Introduction of foreign habitat structure, which may attract and spread foreign species.
  • An expanding human footprint on deep seafloor over time, as the containers degrade and collapse, spreading their contents along the ocean floor.
  • Marine species entrapment and ingestion risks from released container contents.
  • Deposition of plastics, other oil-based products, hazardous materials, and subsequent bioaccumulation.
What Did Scientists Find?
Biological community of deep-sea hard substratum species growing on shipping container
Biological community of deep-sea hard substratum species growing on shipping container TGHU7712262, at 4,203 feet of depth off Monterey Bay, seven years after it was lost at sea
Images: Chad King and Sacha Lozano (MBNMS)
The site was clearly impacted by the shipping container. The most obvious sign of impact was a clear difference in the composition of species found on and immediately adjacent to the container, versus further away. Common species on the container were the sea snail (Neptunea), scallops, and serpulid polychaete worms. Two large crabs were also present under a turned up corner of the container. The fauna on the container was not particularly different to other deep-sea hard substratum habitats investigated in Monterey Bay, but it is foreign to the biological communities living on the soft seafloor at Smooth Ridge. This is likely causing changes in food webs, access to space and resources, and ecological interactions, in a habitat that remains largely unexplored and is not yet understood. The container shows no major signs of wear after 7 years, and it will likely stay there for many hundreds of years.

Deep seafloor species found further away from the lost container
Deep seafloor species found further away from the lost container, representing the natural biological communities living on soft muddy sand flats at 4,000 ft depth, on Smooth Ridge.
Images: Chad King and Sacha Lozano (MBNMS)
MBARI's remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Doc Ricketts
MBARI's ROV Doc Ricketts collecting sediment samples around the lost container, and Dr. Andrew DeVogelaere (MBNMS) monitoring the operation from the ROV's control room.
Images: Chad King and Sacha Lozano (MBNMS)
On the other hand, common species away from the container were juvenile crabs (Lithodidae), sea pigs (Scotoplanes) and sea pens (Anthoptilum). The muddy sand seafloor at 4,000 feet was a beautiful smooth seascape with delicate worm tubes every few inches, abundant sea cucumbers, and red sea pens.

Scientists also collected sediment samples (at the container’s location and further away) to compare the communities of species that live buried in the mud, and investigate the differences in chemistry (nitrogen and carbon). These analyses will provide more specific clues about the nature and extent of ecological changes taking place at the impact site.

A compelling and more detailed recount of the expedition is available in our traveler’s cruise log.

An Expanding Issue, Broader Implications
Most of the consumption items and products we buy and demand travel long distances around the world in piles of cargo containers, stacked on big transport ships. Approximately 200 million container trips occur every year, and 5 - 6 million containers are in transit at any given moment. From all this container traffic, many sources cite a figure of approximately 10,000 containers falling from ships each year. Containers are usually lost in rough seas or during storms. Some common causes of container loss include: increased stacking height, low freeboard, container contents improperly loaded, containers in poor condition, faulty connections between containers, heavier containers placed on top of lighter containers, containers stowed too close together, oversized containers, containers loaded far from amidships, misdeclared container weights, failure to adapt course to weather conditions, and ship crew in the bridge unaware of dangerous conditions.

Responding to global trade demands, ships are getting bigger. Ultra Large Container ships are already travelling international waters. Unfortunately, the growing time demands placed on the shipping industry make it difficult to balance safety and efficiency. While container ship capacity has grown tremendously in the past two decades, safety protocols and securing methods have not been able to keep up. Meanwhile, lost containers continue to populate the deep seafloor at a rate of roughly 10,000 or more per year, potentially creating “stepping stones” for invasive species. The exploration of lost container TGHU7712262 is a first-look study, at one place, at one time. More research is required in order to confidently state the extent of the environmental impact derived from shipping container losses, but we know that a vast majority of the deep sea is still unexplored. In other words, we may be impacting the deep sea before we even understand what is there and how it functions. It is time to consider and start monitoring ecological impacts of lost shipping containers as the containerization industry rapidly develops.

Shipping Routes Through MBNMS
The Port of Oakland is the 4th busiest container port in the U.S., and draws much of the container ship traffic that passes through MBNMS. Traffic routes for cargo ships passing through MBNMS have been recommended in order to minimize the threat risk to marine and coastal wildlife. Container ships following these recommended tracks travel 15 nm off Point Sur and 12.7 nm off Pigeon Point when heading north, and 20 nm off Point Sur and 16 nm off Pigeon Point when heading south. Some conservation groups are campaigning for establishing mandatory, rather than recommended, shipping tracks, in order to reduce threats to sanctuary resources. Several efforts have been made to plot vessel traffic transiting the California coast. These data products can give us an idea of the intensity of container ship traffic passing through the MBNMS
   
National Marine Sanctuaries | National Ocean Service | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce | NOAA Library

click here to go to the NOAA home page For Website comments/questions, contact the MBNMS Webmaster.
For programmatic comments/question, contact the appropriate MBNMS Staff
MBNMS Privacy Statement | Web Site Disclaimer | Web Site Owner: National Ocean Service
This page last modified on: 01/17/12
click here to go to the national marine sanctuaries home page

URL: http://montereybay.noaa.gov/resourcepro/mt/benthic.html