| |
MPA Working Group News & Products
Since the Sanctuary Advisory Council adopted the MPA Action Plan in December of 2003 the MPA working group has been engaged in gathering background information, and in implementing the initial strategies of the plan.
|
- Working Group Membership (60KB PDF)
- Goals (74KB PDF)
|
Upcoming Meetings
MBNMS, 299 Foam St., Monterey |
| |
March 12, 2007 |
10AM - 3PM |
|
|
|
CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS MEETINGS
|
What is a Marine Protected Area?
|
|
"Marine protected area" is an umbrella term for a managed area in the marine environment that provides some level of resource protection. As a type of management tool, MPAs may employ a range of strategies to protect the marine environment - from prohibiting the harvesting of marine life, allowing take of selected species, or restricting other kinds of human activities. Besides having different levels of protection and use, MPAs vary dramatically in size and shape, protect a range of natural or cultural resources, and are established under a variety of authorities. The Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) is a marine protected area itself, as some human activities that could harm the sanctuary's health, such as oil drilling, ocean discharges or seabed mining, are restricted or prohibited in sanctuary waters.
|
|
MPA is not the only term used to describe marine areas with different goals or levels of protection. Often a variety of related terms are used, such as marine park, marine preserve, marine reserve, national marine sanctuary, national seashore, etc. One common misconception is that all MPAs are "no-take" marine reserves closed to public use. In fact, most MPAs, like the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, are managed for multiple uses. Currently less than 1% of the world's oceans and less than .01% of U.S. waters are encompassed by no-take marine reserves. Within the MBNMS, three, small no-take reserves have been designated by the state of California, comprising less than .01% of sanctuary waters.
|
|
What are the Potential Benefits and Costs of Marine Protected Areas?
|
TOP
|
|
Scientific research has shown that carefully crafted marine protected areas (MPAs) - particularly those that restrict or prohibit the removal of marine life - can be effective tools for conserving the diversity of animals and plants, protecting habitats, and increasing both numbers and individual sizes of some species. A well-designed MPA, in which the removal or alteration of marine life is prohibited or restricted, generally contains a greater abundance of species, higher diversity of species, and larger fish within its boundaries relative to similar habitats outside the protected area. These larger fish produce many more young than do smaller fish, and studies for some species have shown that their young are healthier and more likely to survive. MPAs are a useful tool for preventing, slowing, or reversing the degradation of ocean habitats and maintaining the diversity and abundance of species inhabiting them.
|
|
Abundance of rockfish species in and outside of local marine reserves.
Figure courtesy of Steven Palumbi.
|
|
| There are some potential costs associated with MPAs as well. When designing or designating new MPAs, managers need to take into consideration socioeconomic impacts to fishermen, existing fishery management measures, and the potential for fishing effort to shift into other areas. Often, through careful planning and dialogue with the fishing community, these impacts can be minimized while still achieving the desired ecological goals. |

Bigger fish produce more babies. Figure courtesy of PISCO & Donna Schroeder. |
|
Why are New MPAs Being Proposed Around the World?
|
TOP
|
Ocean ecosystems worldwide are threatened because of pollution, overfishing, habitat destruction or coastal development. In response, many governments, scientists, conservation organizations, commercial groups and citizens are increasingly discussing the idea of establishing new, well-designed MPAs to complement existing ocean management strategies.
MPAs are gaining momentum worldwide as a marine conservation tool, from South Africa and New Zealand to Canada. Recently, in a bold move, Australia designated one third of the Great Barrier Reef as a "no-take" area. Since 1986, virtually all of Italy's marine parks, now totaling 23, have established at least one "no-take" area and more and larger "limited-take" areas.
In the United States, both the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy and Pew Oceans Commission recently declared that our oceans are in trouble, and are calling for MPAs to be used as a management tool to support the protection of ocean ecosystems. By executive order, the National MPA Center was established in 2000 to provide science, technology and information related to effective planning, management and evaluation of MPAs nation-wide.
Interest in implementing a system of marine protected areas has increased in California too. In 1999 the Legislature and Governor approved the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) mandating the state to design and manage an improved network of marine protected areas in state waters to protect marine life and habitats, marine ecosystems, and marine natural heritage. Currently the California Resources Agency and California Department of Fish and Game are partnering with others to achieve the goals of the MLPA, with initial efforts focused on developing a MPA network for the Central Coast region.
|
Why are We Considering New MPAs Within the Sanctuary?
|
TOP
|
During the scoping period of the Joint Management Plan Review (see below), the National Marine Sanctuary Program received approximately 7,000 public comments requesting greater ecosystem protection for the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary through the establishment of a network of MPAs. In addtion, a petition with 1,500 signatures was also submitted listing concerns about adopting marine reserves in the sanctuary. MPAs was by far the most heavily raised issue, with both support and concern expressed from Californians as well as residents of nearly every state. The Sanctuary Advisory Council also identified the consideration of new MPAs as a priority issue to be addressed in the new management plan. Similar to the MLPA efforts in state waters (generally within three nautical miles of shore), the MBNMS is now considering using marine protected areas as a management tool in federal waters (beyond three nautical miles). The MBNMS is considering the need for new MPAs and their potential locations for several reasons:
-
|
|
Tiger rockfish (Sebastes nigrocinctus). Photo: King
|
To restore naturally functioning ecosystems and ecological health in sanctuary waters. For example, millions of boccacio, a large and long-lived predatory rockfish, have been harvested from deep-water habitats within the sanctuary over the past few decades. Overharvesting has caused their population to plummet to below 8% of their original abundance. When a severe decline of an important species like this occurs, fishery management agencies must take drastic measures to recover the population. Such depleted populations not only have serious consequences for the health of the region's fisheries, but for the well-being and integrity of the ecosystems in which they reside.
-
|
Leafy hornmouth (Ceratostoma foliatum) and rainbow star (Orthasterias koehleri).
Photo: Lonhart
|
To provide areas where marine research and monitoring can occur apart from the extraction of animals and plants. Only a small percentage (less than .01%) of the sanctuary contains areas where extractive activities are restricted, affording complete protection. The sanctuary features a wide array of habitats, from wave-swept rocky shores to deep submarine canyons. Without having representative habitats protected in their natural state, free from human harvest or extraction, it is difficult for resource managers and researchers to distinguish between human-induced and natural changes in the ecosystem.
-
To provide ecological 'insurance' against environmental variability and unintentional mismanagment. Natural changes to the environment occur in the ocean, just as they do on land. If biological communities are substantially altered by humans, their ability to resist or recover from environmental change or natural disturbance is compromised.
|
Our Goal Related to MPAs
|
TOP
|
|
Fishing boat in Monterey Harbor.
Photo: Damitz
|
Our goal is to determine if additional MPAs, in which the removal or alteration of marine life is restricted or prohibited, may play a role in effective marine conservation and management of the sanctuary. With our partners, we will evaluate whether additional MPAs could help protect, restore or enhance natural habitats, populations and ecological processes, and will design potential MPA networks with these goals in mind. If new MPAs are considered appropriate, their design and location will reflect the importance of allowing for the continuation of long-term sustainable fisheries, since fishing is an important cultural and economic activity in the sanctuary.
|
Achieving Our Goal -- The Marine Protected Areas Action Plan
|
TOP
|
A "Marine Protected Areas Action Plan" was developed jointly with a working group comprised of a variety of stakeholders and partners to ensure community involvement in the decision-making process. Sanctuary staff have been meeting regularly with stakeholders since 2002, including environmental representatives, researchers, fishermen, fishery managers, harbor masters, divers, and others. This group, along with our Sanctuary Advisory Council, will provide key advice on future decisions regarding the need for MPAs and their potential locations within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. The action plan includes the following strategies:
- Forming partnerships with stakeholders and other agencies to facilitate plan implementation
- Developing clear goals and identifying the habitats or ecological processes that could benefit from increased protection
- Developing criteria for designing effective MPAs considering biological factors, human use patterns, size and scale and practical implementation issues
- Determining the types of allowed use
- Conducting socioeconomic impact analyses and identifying mitigation efforts
- Integrating MPAs with other ocean management measures and agencies
- Developing programs for enforcement and compliance, education and outreach, and research and monitoring
- Determining timing strategies, phasing options and evaluation criteria
|
If Recommended, How Would New MPAs Be Established?
|
TOP
|
Although there is still disagreement among the community as to whether or not new MPAs are appropriate within the sanctuary, if the working group ultimately recommends their establishment and location, and sanctuary management concurs with the recommendation, MPAs could be implemented in the future through a variety of mechanisms and agencies. Depending upon their final design, the implementation of new MPAs could draw on various state and federal authorities under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, National Marine Sanctuaries Act, Marine Life Protection Act or Marine Managed Areas Improvement Act.
 |
The MBNMS MPA working group is considering the utility of and potential locations for new MPA's in federal waters within the sanctuary, south of Pigeon Point
View full-size map (36KB PDF) |
During 2005-2006 the sanctuary's working group is focusing on the consideration of MPAs in federal waters (beyond three nautical miles). In phase one, the study area being evaluated in federal waters extends from Pigeon Point south to Cambria. Within this region, the working group is evaluating the utility of and potential alternative locations for MPAs. Sanctuary managers prefer the designation of new MPAs in state waters (within three nautical miles) be accomplished under the authority of the California Fish and Game Commission, through the MLPA process. The study area during the first phase of the MLPA process in state waters extends from Pigeon Point south to Point Conception. Sanctuary staff and MPA working group members are actively participating in the MLPA process. Sanctuary and MLPA staff are working together and coordinating efforts, ensuring these processes support each other and share resources for optimal results.
|
An update on MBNMS MPA Working Group Efforts
|
TOP
|
Since the Sanctuary Advisory Council adopted the MPA Action Plan in December of 2003, the MPA working group has gathered background information, and implemented initial strategies of the plan. (Click here for a list of working group members and their affiliations.) They have used the policies of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to guide them in articulating specific goals for a MPA program. The group has also provided expert advice regarding an assessment of biological resources and habitats, and a socioeconomic study contracted to examine the status of fisheries in the Sanctuary. Most recently, the working group has been involved in developing questions and considering data for a computer-based support tool to aid in the consideration and siting of MPAs. The working group is developing a timeline that lays out the steps necessary to forward a MPA proposal to the Sanctuary Advisory Council. As dates and agendas for future MPA meetings become available they will be posted on the MPA website.
|
Joint Management Plan Review
|
TOP
|
The National Marine Sanctuary Program is currently updating management plans for three west coast sanctuaries - Cordell Bank, Gulf of the Farallones and Monterey Bay - in a process known as the Joint Management Plan Review. "Marine Protected Areas" is one of 32 issues for which an action plan was developed for inclusion in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary's Draft Management Plan. The Draft Management Plan, once finalized, will guide management of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary for the next five years. The plan is a revision of the original management plan, adopted with sanctuary designation in 1992, and is focused on how to best understand and protect the sanctuary's natural and cultural resources.
|
How You Can Participate
|
TOP
|
We welcome your ideas about important resource management issues in the sanctuary. A Draft Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement are scheduled for release to the public in spring of 2006. Following their release, hearings will be held in several locations throughout the region to gather public comment. Written comments will be accepted as well. To find out about public hearings, or how to submit written comments, please visit our website at http://www.sanctuaries.nos.noaa.gov/jointplan. Also, you may submit comments or questions about the efforts of the MBNMS MPA working group to Huff McGonigal at Huff.McGonigal@noaa.gov.
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/
Marine Life Protection Act Initiative
http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mrd/mlpa/
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary: A Review of the Ecological Effectiveness of Subtidal Marine Reserves in Central California Part 1: Synopsis of Scientific Investigations
http://www.mbnms.nos.noaa.gov/reports/2002/starr1_120402.pdf
Part 2: Summary of Existing Marine Reserves in Central California and their Potential Benefits
http://www.mbnms.nos.noaa.gov/reports/2002/starr2_120402.pdf
NOAA's National Marine Protected Areas Center
http://www.mpa.gov/
Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans: The Science of Marine Reserves
http://www.piscoweb.org/outreach/pubs/reserves/index.html
Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring Network (SIMoN)
http://www.mbnms-simon.org
| Previous Meetings |
| |
Sept. 14th, 2005 |
MPA Working Group meeting |
Agenda (16KB PDF) |
| |
Oct. 19th, 2005 |
MPA Working Group meeting |
Agenda (12KB PDF) |
|