|

|

|
Examples
of Endangered and Threatened Species of
the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary
|

|

|
The
California Brown Pelican, a year-round
Sanctuary resident, is an endangered
species. (©1999 Jenny
Carless)
|
The
World Wildlife Fund has estimated that as many as
one-fifth of the animals we know about today could
be gone by 2025. Habitat loss, species harvest,
disease, inadequate conservation laws, pollution,
and the introduction of non-native species can all
contribute to a species' decline.
The list on the right
represents threatened or endangered species or
subspecies that can be found in or near the
boundaries of the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary. Ranking codes for the California
Department of Fish and Game's "California Natural
Diversity Database" (June 1999) indicate that the
Guadalupe fur seal and the salt marsh harvest mouse
are extremely endangered within California and
throughout their worldwide ranges. Several other
species are ranked as "extremely endangered" in
California, including the southern sea otter, the
California Clapper Rail, the Marbled Murrelet, and
three Chinook salmon runs. The winter-run Chinook
salmon is ranked as "extirpated" (destroyed or
exterminated) in California. All other threatened
or endangered species listed here are ranked as
"endangered" in California. (The Database does not
have ranks for any of the cetaceans or marine
turtles.) About 19 percent (26 of 139 species) of
the threatened or endangered animals in California
can be found living in or near the
Sanctuary.
Endangered
and Threatened
Species
|
Organism
|
Federal
Status
(Date Listed)
|
State
Status
(Date Listed)
|
Cetaceans
|
Sei whale
(Balaenoptera
borealis)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Blue whale (Balaenoptera
musculus)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Finback whale (Balaenoptera
physalus)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Right whale
(Balaena glacialis)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Sperm whale (Physeter
macrocephalus)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Pinnipeds
|
Guadalupe fur seal
(Arctocephalus
townsendi)
|
Threatened
(11-Mar-67)
|
Threatened, Fully Protected
(27-Jun-71)
|
Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus)
|
Threatened
(10-Apr-90)
|
|
Fissiped
|
Southern sea otter (Enhydra
lutris nereis)
|
Threatened
(14-Jan-77)
|
Fully Protected
|
Land Mammals
|
Salt marsh harvest mouse
(Reithrodontomys
raviventris)
|
Endangered
(13-Oct-70)
|
Endangered, Fully
Protected
(27-Jun-71)
|
Birds
|
American Peregrine Falcon
(Falco peregrinus
anatum)
|
Endangered
(13-Oct-70)
|
Endangered (27-Jun-71)
|
California Brown Pelican
(Pelecanus occidentalis
californicus)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
Endangered, Fully Protected
(27-Jun-71)
|
California Clapper Rail
(Rallus longirostris
obsoletus)
|
Endangered
(13-Oct-70)
|
Endangered, Fully Protected
(27-Jun-71)
|
Western Snowy Plover
(Charadrius alexandrinus
nivosus)
|
Threatened
(05-Mar-93)
|
Species of Special Concern
|
Marbled Murrelet
(Brachyramphus
marmoratus)
|
Threatened
(01-Oct-92)
|
Endangered
(12-Mar-92)
|
Turtles
|
Green sea turtle (Chelonia
mydas)
|
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
|
Leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea)
|
Endangered
(02-Jun-70)
|
|
Pacific Ridley sea turtle
(Lepidochelys
olivacea)
|
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
|
Loggerhead sea turtle
(Caretta caretta)
|
Threatened
(28-Jul-78)
|
|
Fishes
|
Chinook salmon - winter
(Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha)
|
Endangered
(04-Jan-94)
|
Endangered
(22-Sep-89)
|
Chinook salmon - fall/late
fall (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha)
|
Candidate
(16-Sep-99)
|
|
Chinook salmon - spring
(Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha)
|
Threatened
(16-Sep-
|
|
Coho salmon - central
California (Oncorhynchus
kisutch)
|
Threatened
(31-Oct-96)
|
Endangered
(31-Dec-95)
|
Steelhead - central California
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
|
Threatened
(18-Aug-97)
|
|
Steelhead - south/central
California (Oncorhynchus mykiss
irideus)
|
Threatened
(18-Aug-97)
|
|
Tidewater goby
(Eucyclogobius
newberryi)
|
Endangered (04-Feb-94)
Delisting under consideration
(was proposed 24-Jun-99)
|
|
|
*Compiled by Patrick Cotter and Jen Jolly, Monterey
Bay National Marine Sanctuary
Note: shaded areas indicate listing after Sanctuary
designation (September 1992)|

|
Leatherback
Turtles
|

|
|
Strandings
Statewide
|
Strandings
along the
Sanctuary
|
1982
|
1
|
0
|
1983
|
1
|
0
|
1984
|
0
|
0
|
1985
|
5
|
4
|
1986
|
5
|
2
|
1987
|
1
|
1
|
1988
|
7
|
4
|
1989
|
9
|
5
|
1990
|
11
|
8
|
1991
|
8
|
-
|
1992
|
2
|
-
|
1993
|
9
|
-
|
1994
|
4
|
-
|
1995
|
1
|
-
|
1996
|
3
|
-
|
1997
|
0
|
-
|
1998
|
2
|
-
|
1999
(Jan.-Oct.)
|
9
|
6
|
|
Source:
Marine Mammal Stranding Network, run by
NMFS, Southwest Region
Note: The data in the left column were not
broken out by county from 1991 to
1998.
|
Each
summer and fall a few lucky boaters catch a glimpse
of a rare visitor to the Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary: a leatherback sea turtle.
Although the leatherback is the most common sea
turtle along North America's West Coast, a typical
year will yield only one or two dozen sightings of
this endangered animal in the waters surrounding
Monterey Bay. The leatherback sea turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea) is one of the largest living
reptiles, with adults reaching 2 meters (6 feet) in
length and weighing up to 700 kg (1,500 pounds). It
has the widest geographic range of all reptiles and
is the only species of sea turtle that spends its
time in the offshore pelagic environment rather
than in coastal waters. Leatherbacks are most
commonly seen between July and October, when
Monterey Bay's sea surface temperature warms to
15-16° C and large jellies—their primary
prey—are seasonally abundant.
Occasionally a dead sea
turtle will wash ashore, giving researchers the
opportunity to measure and autopsy its carcass. Sea
turtle strandings have been reported by the
California Marine Mammal Stranding Network since
1982. In 1999 six leatherback turtles washed ashore
in the Sanctuary—a few more than in the last few
years, but not an unusually high number. Cause of
death is almost always indeterminable due to
carcass decomposition, but some scientists suspect
that the leading cause of death to turtles at sea
is accidental entanglement in fishing gillnets in
waters offshore of North and South
America.
Despite having been listed
as a federal Endangered Species in 1970,
leatherback populations have continued to decline
in recent years, with extremely fast and alarming
declines in the Pacific breeding populations. The
nesting colony along the Mexican coast, which in
the 1970s hosted tens of thousands of nesting
female leatherbacks, has declined at an annual rate
of 22 percent for the last fifteen years and is now
reduced to 250 nesting females. DNA studies have
shown that the leatherbacks that visit the
Sanctuary are males and juveniles, mostly from
Indonesian nesting grounds. Very little is known
about males or juveniles, since only adult females
make themselves available for study by hauling out
on land to lay eggs. The migration patterns that
bring leatherback turtles from far-off nesting
sites to Monterey Bay are also unknown. The
Sanctuary intends to participate in upcoming
leatherback tagging and tracking projects that will
provide necessary information about this critically
endangered species.
--Jen Jolly
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary

|
Sea
Otter Status
|

|
Time
and time again the Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary reminds us of the link between land and
sea. We may think of Monterey Bay as an ocean
sanctuary, but the southern sea otter—a top
carnivore of the nearshore and the embodiment of
that link—is suffering a population decline that
indicates both how marine life can be affected by
land-based problems and how complicated it is to
provide real sanctuary to marine life.
For the last three years
southern sea otter numbers have been declining
consistently. From a population peak of 2,377 total
otters in 1995, the population was last estimated
to number just over 2,000. The carcass count
remains high, giving no hint that the population
will miraculously recover any time soon.
A single reason for the
decline cannot be pinpointed. Forty percent of the
beachcast carcasses indicate the animal died of
infectious disease—an extremely unusual number
in nature. Another 20 percent die of trauma: either
boat strike, gunshot, or shark bite. For the rest,
the cause of death cannot be determined.
A variety of agencies are
at work trying to unravel this endangered species
mystery. Research funding—although never
enough--is being provided by the World Wildlife
Fund, The Otter Project, the David and Lucile
Packard Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife
Foundation, The Goldman Fund, and the Monterey Bay
National Marine Sanctuary.

|
The
population of southern sea otters
continues to decline; scientists cannot
yet pinpoint a specific reason for this
decline.
|
Researchers from the
Biological Resources Division of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) are studying population
dynamics and fisheries interactions. Veterinarians
and pathologists from the California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) Marine Wildlife Veterinary
Care and Research Center, U.C. Davis, and USGS's
National Wildlife Health Center are studying cause
of death and the effects of disease on the sea
otter population. Researchers from Michigan State
University are studying the relationship between
the very high levels of certain pollutants (such as
DDT, PCB, and tributyltin) found in sea otter
tissues and disease in sea otters. Still other
researchers from CDFG are tracing the pollutants to
sea otter prey. On-board observers from the
National Marine Fisheries Service are determining
the impact of gillnet fisheries on the sea otter as
well as other marine mammals and birds. The
Monterey Bay Aquarium takes in stranded otters --
often pups—and tremendous efforts are made to
learn better rehabilitation techniques and return
healthy otters to the wild.
The recent declines in the
California sea otter population are apparently
related to a variety of causes. Only careful
research, the sharing of data and expertise, and a
broad team approach will help this critical species
recover.
--Steve
Shimek
The Otter Project, Inc.

|
A
Bad Year for Snowy
Plovers
|

|
There
was a severe decline in the breeding success of the
threatened Snowy Plover in the Monterey Bay area in
1999. Only 100 chicks fledged (lived until able to
fly) from the area, compared with 145 in 1998 and
154 in 1997. There were a number of reasons for
this, beginning with the fact that there were far
fewer breeding birds around the bay than
previously. Males decreased from 111 in 1998 to 78
this year and females declined from 99 to 68.
Winter mortality would appear to be the cause, but
we cannot assign a reason for that increased loss.
In addition, because of late storms, there was a
late start to the breeding season.
In 1999 a total of 282
chicks hatched from 138 nests in the Monterey Bay
area, including Wilder, Laguna, and Scott Creeks.
Seventy-eight percent of all the nests hatched at
least one chick. That was a pretty good start, but
in most areas things went downhill from there. On
the outer beaches of Monterey Bay only 17 of the
123 chicks that hatched fledged (0.26 juveniles per
nest)—far too few to replace adult losses. This
shortfall could not be made up by relative success
in other areas. For instance, in the pocket beaches
north of Santa Cruz (Wilder, Laguna, and Scott
Creeks) 15 of 28 chicks fledged (1.07
juveniles/nest). In the Moss Landing salt ponds 68
of 131 hatched, for a fledge rate of
1.17.
Aerial predators were
almost surely the cause of poor fledgling success
on Monterey Bay beaches. American Kestrels, known
to prey on Snowy Plover chicks, were frequently
seen on Marina beaches during the nesting season.
Northern Harriers were present at the Salinas
National Wildlife Refuge during the time that six
of seven broods failed. In addition, the number of
nesting Killdeers in the refuge was two to three
times normal. It is possible that Snowy Plover
brood loss might have been affected by competition
with nesting Killdeers. At Zmudowski State Beach
the culprit was almost certainly the Loggerhead
Shrike, another well-known predator of Snowy Plover
chicks. The shrikes were seen on the beach
constantly during the breeding season and, in fact,
were known to take one brood as it hatched. Even
though the Moss Landing salt ponds rated as a
success, it could have been greater had not
harriers preyed on the chicks in the latter part of
the season.
At least a couple of
successful years are necessary to recover from this
bad one. Also, better control of native predators
may be needed to increase reproductive success. We
hope to live trap and relocate some of these
predators in 2000.
--John S.
Warriner
Point Reyes Bird Observatory
|