
|
Brambles
and the Deep Sea Prickly Sharks in the
Monterey Canyon
|

|
Historically,
the study of the deep sea has been limited due to
its distance from ports. The Monterey Canyon comes
close to shore, however, bringing the deep sea to
our backyard and providing opportunities to study
the processes that govern life in the deep ocean
enviroment. We have been working with a group of
scientists to take advantage of this opportunity to
study prickly sharks (Echinorhinus cookei), a rare
deep-water shark species.
Prickly sharks are one of
two species of shark known as bramble sharks in the
family Echinorhinidae. They are named for the
sharp, thorny dermal denticles or scales that leave
their skin rough to touch. Few facts have been
published about the basic biology of prickly
sharks, as the majority of reports are based on
descriptions of a small number of dead animals
incidentally caught in fisheries. From the few
animals that have been caught, we know that prickly
sharks occur in temperate and tropical waters of
the Pacific ocean, ranging in depth from 70–400
m. They reach a maximum length of 4.3 m and their
diet appears to consist of small sharks, shark egg
cases, octopus, squid, and some fishes.
For several years in the
early 1990s, divers observed these sharks in
aggregations of up to thirty animals at the head of
the Monterey Canyon. These repeated observations
led scientists from five different institutions to
collaborate in 1999 on a preliminary study of
prickly shark movements. Researchers from the
University of California Sea Grant Extension
Program, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, the
Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey Bay Aquarium
Research Institute, and the Pfleger Institute of
Environmental Research caught and placed sonic
transmitters on eight prickly sharks to learn more
about the basic aspects of shark biology. Our two
primary study objectives were to determine if we
could capture prickly sharks and to develop
appropriate tagging and tracking techniques for use
in future studies.
This year, prickly sharks
were caught at the canyon head using a modified
longline attached to a surface buoy. Once a shark
was brought to the surface and secured to the side
of the boat, an acoustic tag, which transmitted
depth information, was attached to its dorsal
musculature using medical grade plastic darts. The
procedure lasted less than ten minutes from catch
to release. Immediately after release, the sharks
were tracked using two methods. The first method
consisted of listening for tag transmissions with a
directional hydrophone from a small skiff. This
active tracking method allowed for the detection of
sharks throughout the canyon, but was limited to
daylight and good weather. The second method
consisted of placing a subsurface listening station
at the head of the Monterey Canyon. This passive
listening station was able to gather data
continuously, but could only record tag
transmissions from sharks that were near the canyon
head.
Prickly sharks moved more
than we expected this year. Acoustic tags stayed on
the sharks for the battery life of the tags—at
least three months. During that time, sharks moved
frequently during the study and ranged in depth
from as little as 5 m of water near the canyon head
to as deep as 375 m at a distance of 10 km
offshore. Preliminary data analyses indicated four
patterns of daily activity associated with prickly
sharks: (1) present at the canyon head at night but
in deep water during the day, (2) in deep water at
night and at the canyon head during the day, (3) at
the canyon head the entire day, and (4) completely
absent from the canyon head.
Reasons for this wide
variety of movements are as yet unknown. Do prickly
sharks aggregate at the canyon head to mate, as
indicated by the multiple scars on captured
females? Or are they coming out of deep water for
some other reason, such as to forage at the canyon
head? As we work to answer questions such as these,
we hope to learn more about the ecological
relationship between prickly sharks and canyon
heads.
Richard M. Starr1 and
Jason Felton1, 2,
with Gregor M. Cailliet2, Heidi
Dewar3,
John Heine2, Norm Maher4,
and John O'Sullivan5
1 University of California
Sea Grant Extension Program
2 Moss Landing Marine Laboratories
3 Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research
4 Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
5 Monterey Bay Aquarium

|
Monterey
Bay Discoveries
|

|
An
increase in underwater exploration and research
with both manned and unmanned submersible vehicles
has resulted in the discovery of new species, new
behaviors, and new knowledge about the wonderful
world below the surface of the waves. New species
descriptions often take a long time to publish
because publications require a complete review of
the existing literature and a detailed description
of the species.
|
Scientists
have just submitted a manuscript
describing this ctenophore species.(George
I. Matsumoto ©1999)
|
Researchers at Monterey Bay Aquarium Research
Institute (MBARI) and Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution have just submitted a manuscript
describing a ctenophore, or comb jelly, first seen
twenty years ago. Following the 1999 published
description of a new species of larvacean, MBARI
scientists are continuing work with a colleague at
the University of Massachusetts on descriptions of
several other larvacean species. Some of these
deep-sea animals have been so difficult to observe
and collect that the descriptions are on hold until
further specimens can be obtained. These include a
small jelly nicknamed "bumpy" that is found near
the ocean bottom at the head of Soquel Canyon (a
smaller canyon that feeds into the larger Monterey
Canyon) and a larger jelly observed (but not
collected) on Pioneer Seamount.
MBARI ecologists also published on mid-water
mimicry. (Several species demonstrated curling behavior thought
to mimic the outline of a jelly.) The authors used a novel format
that incorporates the typical hard-copy scientific publication
with an electronic publication (www.mbari.org/rd/midwater)
that includes video clips demonstrating the described behavior.
Scientists also determined that bioluminescence in one species
of medusa originates from diet rather than an intrinsic source.
Benthic ecologists are studying a new symbiont found in Monterey
Bay tube worms that is very different from the typical sulfur
oxidizing bacteria found in other tube worms.
|
This
new species has been nicknamed 'bumpy'
until a scientific name is published.
(Kevin A. Raskoff ©1999
MBARI)
|
MBARI molecular biologists have been working on
the construction of a large (up to 150,000 bases)
artificial bacterial chromosome library developed
from seawater microorganisms. These Environmental
Bacterial Artificial Chromosome libraries will
provide unprecedented access to the genomes of
uncultivated microorganisms and future
understanding of their genetics, biochemistry, and
role in the environment.
Oceanographers at Moss
Landing Marine Laboratories and MBARI investigated
the sources of iron in coastal ecosystems. Their
results show that iron is added naturally to ocean
waters from the continental shelf during coastal
upwelling, a seasonal wind-driven process. These
findings were particularly surprising because they
suggest that coastal rivers are relatively
unimportant as iron sources.
--George
Matsumoto
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

|
Biological
Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Disposal in the
Deep Sea
|

|
Oceans
represent the largest potential sink for absorbing
man-made carbon dioxide (CO2). The disposal of CO2
in the sea has therefore been proposed as a measure
to help decrease global warming. However, direct
ocean disposal of CO2 will only be of value if
environmental impacts to marine systems are
significantly less than the impacts avoided in
atmospheric release. In addition to Monterey Bay
Aquarium Research Institute's (MBARI) ongoing
research on the behavior of CO2 released into the
sea, researchers have begun to explore how
CO2-enriched (low pH and high pCO2) seawater might
impact marine life.
While several CO2 disposal
scenarios have been proposed at various ocean
depths and in different forms (gas, liquid, solid,
and hydrate), almost nothing is known about impacts
on marine organisms. The few studies that directly
considered the biological effects of ocean CO2
disposal have been toxicological models based on
published values for mortality of shallow water
animals (both fresh and marine) when exposed to low
pH solutions. These models make two important
assumptions: (1) the only important environmental
impact is reduced pH and not increased carbon
dioxide partial pressure (pCO2); and (2) only
passively drifting or sessile organisms will be
affected directly because mobile animals will avoid
CO2 discharge sites. While this work is valuable in
predicting the magnitude of potential losses,
controlled experiments are needed both to examine
the appropriate species that may be at risk in the
various disposal scenarios and to test the model
assumptions.
Using the
remotely-operated vehicle (ROV) Ventana to conduct
experiments at 625 m within Monterey Canyon,
researchers from MBARI and the Monterey Bay
National Marine Sanctuary have found that many
species (both invertebrate and vertebrate) do not
avoid rapidly dissolving CO2 hydrates when
attracted by the scent of food. Further, the
animals appeared to suffer from respiratory
distress due to increased pCO2, and not decreased
pH, when in close proximity to dissolving hydrates.
One hagfish in particular swam very close to the
CO2 hydrate and lost consciousness, sank to the
bottom, and rolled over on its dorsal side.
After a few seconds it
recovered and resumed tracking the odor plume back
to its source. Twice more the same hagfish
approached the hydrate, then lost consciousness. In
all instances, the animal appeared to recover and
resumed swimming only after it rolled down stream,
away from the dissolving CO2 hydrate.
Oceans are clearly an
integral component in global processes. However, we
still do not understand completely all the complex
physical, chemical, and biological factors that
regulate marine systems and how they interact.
Any dramatic, large-scale
changes made to these systems must therefore be
done with great caution. While it is extremely
unlikely that CO2 will ever be disposed of within
Sanctuary boundaries, the work of local scientists
and Sanctuary staff has contributed vital new
insight to this important environmental
issue.
--Mario Tamburri,
Research Fellow
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
Monterey Bay Aquarium
|